The year 2000 and the Iraq factor
Strong circumstantial evidence points to a Saudi-Israeli plot behind the September 11 attacks, with complicity of course, from well placed insiders within America. We must remember the background to the 911 attacks, to better understand circumstances of regional and global ‘Zeitgeists’. The year 2000 was a very important year. For one, it marked a tumultuous year for Israel, with the collapse of the Camp David peace talks and the outbreak of the second Palestinian Intifada. Ariel Sharon’s fundamentalist Likud party had an interest to torpedo the talks and the atmosphere of talks within which Ehud Barak was conducting with Yasser Arafat and American mediation. Ariel Sharon in the typical distaste of the Zionist Haredi Jews, paid a calculatedly provocative visit to the Haram al Sharif, or ‘Temple Mount’. It was to be a double-edged sword for Israel. On one hand, it satisifed Likud and the Israeli ‘Deep State’, with Ariel Sharon winning elections in 2001. However, the second Intifada exposed Israel’s vulnerability and worried many extremists within Israel itself, vindicating their unwavering beliefs that Palestinians and Muslims in general, needed to be crushed. This was due to the Muslim world rallying in support of Palestine, a notion which always frightened the Zionist bully. Saddam Hussein of Iraq in particular, stepped in and offered to pay the families of slain Palestinians along with Palestinian martyrs and shahids monetary compensation. This was very likely the final red line that prompted the Anglo-Zionist-Wahhabi axis to go ahead with the September 11 attacks in order to justify not only the take-down of Saddam Hussein but ultimately, to bring the US military machine back to the Middle East with renewed vigor to begin knocking out Arab strongmen in the region which bolstered the Palestinian cause. The plot would serve Israel first and foremost, sacrificing American lives, resources and credibility in the process. Israel was the greatest beneficary from the September 11 attacks. In 2002, Benjamin Netanyahu gave a speech to Congress with a subtle threat aimed at Iran, calling for an inspirational regime change operation against the Iraqi state, one year before it actually occurred.
The justification was provided in a 2000 paper written by a prominent ‘Neoconservative’ Zionist think tank called the ‘Project for a New American Century’ (PNAC). The paper was written by Bill Kristol and Robert Kagan dubbed ‘Rebuilding America’s Defenses’, essentially justifying American military brute force to operate with carte blanche and with global scope, taking down any rival ‘threats’ to what was deemed a post-Cold War triumphalist entitlement i.e. ‘America’s century’. Notably, a ‘Pearl Harbor’-like event was referenced to spur on the paper’s intent which many would argue was 911 itself. There was yet another reason why Saddam Hussein’s Iraq posed a significant problem for the US. In 1999, the ‘Euro’ currency was born, which went on to become the second most popular global reserve currency in the world, and greatest threat towards US dollar supremacy. In 2000, a defiant Saddam vowed to sell Iraq’s oil exports in euros, not dollars. Iraq was under sanctions imposed by the Americans in the wake of the first ‘Gulf War’. A lifeblood for Iraq was agreed in 1995 under ‘UN Security Resolution 986’ dubbed the ‘Oil-for-Food’ programme whereby Iraq could export some of its oil unimpeded in exchange for food and humanitarian goods the economy needed. It was a typical ‘deal’ imposed by the West onto its subjugated victims, with the aim of controlling how a country would manage its own resources in a humiliating manner. Saddam however, remained defiant to ditch the US dollar from the equation.
Understanding the roots of the Saud-Wahhab Islamic impostor regime and the modern Arab political landscape
The story of Arabia goes back to pre-Islamic times. Various warring Arabian tribes and clans lived in what is now modern Saudi Arabia. These were the ancestors of modern Arabs, in fact, one could argue that the birthplace of the Arabs was the Arabian peninsula. Arabs were a Semitic tribe that originally came to Arabia from remnants of the old Mesopotamian empires. Before Islam, Arabia was a melting pot of polytheists, Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians. A major event that shook the Arabian peninsula was the birth of Islam in the Hejaz region of Arabia, where Medina and Mecca stood as rival city-states. Muhammad founded Islam around the year 610 AD. It established the importance of Mecca and Medina to all Muslims, cementing Arabia as the birthplace of not only Arabs, but Islam itself. Thus Arabic became the official language of the Quran, and Islam became the dominant tool for ‘Arabizing’ distant lands. Islam managed to unite all the warring tribes together under the same banner, something that hadn’t been done before. The Islamic caliphate was born in the years after Muhammad died in 632 AD, and immediately swept much of the known world at lightning speed.
By the 18th century, much of Arabia at this time consisted of warring tribes ruling various city-states. Upon his return after some foreign travels to Iran and Iraq (Basra), a maverick theologian from the town of Uyayna in Nejd, by the name of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, was emerging as a charismatic yet divisive figure. He rejected orthodox Sunni Islam and instead took on an extreme and puritanical interpretation of Islam, ‘Salafism’. He was essentially laying the groundwork for the first ‘Salafi’ movement, or ‘the return to the ways’, customs and mannerisms of the earliest followers of Islam, – Salafs, like Muhammad and his companions. He was attempting to lead a revivalist and revisionist movement within Islam itself, after his travels revealed to him that most Muslims, at least according to him, have been led astray and fell out with the true teachings of Islam. He championed a literal interpretation of the Quran, Hadiths, Sunnah and promoted the austere life. But what distinguished him from most other contemporary Sunni scholars was his notion of ‘Takfir’, or rather, excessive use of it. It was the power to label fellow Muslims as ‘Kafirs’ or infidels, over what he deemed as un-Islamic practices and behavior. Whoever was regarded as ‘kafir’ to him should be killed and have his family and possessions violated and confiscated. This got him in trouble with many other Sunni scholars and he soon found himself banished. Back to wandering the deserts of Arabia, he was taken in by one dominant tribe which controlled the town of Diriyah, lead by a emir-warrior by the name of Muhammad ibn Saud. The two struck up a practical relationship that would see both of their mutual interests preserved – power and religion. In 1744, the first ‘Saudi’ state was born, – the emirate of Diriyah. The modern day capital of Riyadh lies exactly where the first Saudi State was founded. Muhammad ibn Saud would remain as the leader of the new emirate, while Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab would lead religious affairs and be allowed to promote his brand of Salafi Islam throughout the emirate which became known as ‘Wahhabism’. This dualistic fusion between the al-Saud and al-Wahhab clans would lay the basis of modern day Saudi Arabia.
The first Saudi state was established but alerted the Ottomans, who sent forces to crush the Wahhabi movement, pacifying the region in 1818. A second Saudi state emerged in 1824, albeit smaller in size, lasting until 1891. In 1871, European power politics shifted dramatically, with Otto Von Bismarck achieving the unification of Germany, – no easy feat, resulting in a burgeoning German empire expanding and competing with other established European colonial powers. The Germans, rivaling France, Britain and Tsarist Russia, began to curry favour with the Ottoman empire, which ruled over much of the Arabian peninsula. This would set the stage for their alliance during the Great War of 1914. While the Ottomans were constructing the famous Hejaz Railway, linking Istanbul with Medina, the Germans began working on the Berlin-Baghdad Railway, with Ottoman approval, hoping to further extend it to the Persian Gulf. Germany wanted to supply its naval forces and trade oil with its African empire. However, this threatened British interests in the Middle East, especially around Basra, and some have argued that the German move with the railway could have been a major reason for British hostility towards Germany in the lead up to World War I.
In 1906, Abdul-Aziz bin Saud, ruler of the Sauds, was busy consolidated power against the rival tribe of the Rashids, by enlisting the help of the ‘Ikhwan’, or ‘brotherhood’, – an army of Wahhabi tribesmen. These forces were pivotal in helping the Sauds secure power. He successfully re-took Nejd, and became recognized by the Ottomans as their client in Arabia. Arabia was divided up in two major regions – Nejd and Hejaz. With Al-Saud controlling Nejd, Hejaz remained under the auspices of a Hashemite, or descendant of Muhammad, the Sharif of Mecca; Hussein bin Ali. As tensions were boiling in Europe, the Ottoman empire, Austria-Hungary and Germany began to align on the same side. By the outbreak of World War I, the British immediately moved to the Middle East and secured Basra, stifling the German railroad plan. By 1916 it became increasingly obvious as to who the victors of the war would be, France and Britain began to secretly partition the Middle East into spheres of influence among themselves and Tsarist Russia. The British, being the dominant global empire at the time, laid out their vision of the Middle East. The famous T.E Lawrence, an agent of the British empire, was enlisted to help stoke Arab revolts against the Ottomans in Arabia. On behalf of the British government, he promised the Sharif of Mecca, who was the guardian of Mecca at the time, a pan-Arab state if he helped the British wage an Arab revolt against the Ottoman garrisons. The Sharif obliged, while the Sauds were still busy fighting the Rashids around Nejd.
In 1908, the first crude oil discovered in the Middle East was in Persia, under the aegis of a British expedition. This immediately galvanized speculation about more possible crude oil reserves in surrounding countries. In the early 1920s, after World War I had ended and Britain had secured a presence near Arabia, Abdul-Aziz bin Saud was largely in control of Nejd and most of Arabia, however Hejaz was still under the control of the Sharif of Mecca, backed by Britain. The Sharif, who was promised a pan-Arab state by T.E Lawrence, along with all the Arabs who helped overthrow the Ottoman garrisons, was ultimately backstabbed by the British. The pan-Arab state never transpired, and the Sharif became inconvenient and no longer useful to the British. It so happened to be that Abdul-Aziz and his clan of Wahhabi Ikhwan warriors marched on Hejaz and deposed the Sharif, seizing Hejaz and virtually the entire Arabian peninsula. This resulted in the British throwing their support behind the Sauds. Unfortunately for the Sharif, the Hashemites were expelled from Hejaz by the Saud-Wahhabs. The Hashemites were given control of Transjordan and Iraq by the British where they eventually settled and became vassals.
Abdul-Aziz bin Saud united Nejd and Hejaz into the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 1930, and was granted independence and recognized as the legitimate ruler of the Saudi Arabian kingdom by Britain. Abdul-Aziz thus founded modern day Saudi Arabia. His Ikhwan Wahhabi warriors became the official religious clergy of the new Kingdom, uprooting the old guard and instilling an extreme and puritanical revision of Islam – ‘Wahhabism’ – all over Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia formalized borders with other newly created states under Sykes-Picot: Iraq, Kuwait and Transjordan, – a country that would later be split into the Palestinian Mandate and Israel. The descendants of the original ibn Saud and al-Wahhab would now inherit what was soon to become one of the richest countries in the world, forming an extremely insular absolute monarchy and a perverted interpretation of Islam with global reach and consequences.
Saudi Arabia was falling into the orbit of the British empire. With the late entry of the US in World War I in 1917 after some of its merchant vessels were sunk by the Germans, the US began to come out of its governing ‘Isolationist’ doctrine. It would not fully swing into a policy of ‘interventionism’ until after the second world war. It was still an infant power, albeit one in the ascendancy. The British empire was beginning to decline, exhausted by the Great War. As a resurgent Germany was electrified by Nazism during the 1930s, the US was in search for new energy sources to power its growing economy. One notable American oil company, Standard Oil, discovered oil in 1932 while prospecting in Bahrain. This immediately triggered interest in Arabia, and by 1933 the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia granted concessions to Standard Oil to search for oil on its territory. In 1938 Standard Oil finally struck oil in the kingdom. Thus, the makings of a strategic Anglo-American-Wahhabi alliance were beginning to take shape in the late 1930s.
With the outbreak of WWII in 1939, the US was in a stronger position to participate in the war. And it did just that, dramatically altering the course of the war in the Pacific against imperial Japan, while the Soviets did the bulk of the fighting against the Nazi war machine in Europe, after Hitler made his fatal error and reneged on the Ribbentrop-Molotov non-aggression pact and set his sights on Moscow. This marked the beginning in the downfall of the Hitler regime. By 1944, Standard Oil merged with Arabian Oil to form ‘Aramco’, – the ‘Arab-American Oil Company’, the predecessor to Saudi Aramco, among the world’s most profitable companies. As the war in Europe was winding down, the US emerged as one of the victors, in a much stronger position than Britain or France, who were exhausted. Britain passed the baton of its Anglo empire to the US, the bulk of Nazi Germany’s scientists and engineers were granted asylum in America during a secret program, and Franklin Roosevelt cemented relations with Abdul-Aziz bin Saud. Franklin Roosevelt was now well aware of the oil assets the Saudis possessed, and in 1944 during a famous meeting with Abdul-Aziz, promised him security in return for a steady supply of oil. In 1948, the world’s biggest onshore oil field was discovered in Saudi Arabia – Ghawar. In 1951, the world’s biggest offshore oil field was also discovered in Saudi Arabia – Safaniyah. Both were located in Shia-majority regions of Saudi Arabia. The US now had a hugely important strategic ally in the Middle East, and this powerful relationship would reverberate to this day.
Today, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, UAE and Kuwait are occupied by successors to the Western marionette regimes that once traced their roots to the era of British skulduggery in the region. We thus see that the Gulf Arab absolute monarchies have been propped up by Anglo American elites for at least the past 100 years, with Jordan, Kuwait and Bahrain being the most loyal vassals. Saudi Arabia, UAE and Qatar due to their greater leverage and influence in the region, are attempting a more multipolar foreign policy not geared towards full vassalage towards the West, however, until American troops are evicted from their lands, we cannot describe them as fully sovereign. British appointed monarchs in Egypt, Syria, Libya and Iraq on the other hand, did not last. They were deposed and replaced with Arab secular socialist nationalists in the aftermath of WWII – with strongmen of the likes of Gamal Nasser, Muammar Gaddafi, Hafez Assad and Saddam Hussein. As such, they have always been a thorn for the Anglo Americans ever since.
In 1924, Mustafa Kemal abolished the Islamic Caliphate and the Ottoman empire was dismantled. The Islamic world fell into disarray as the predatory Anglo Americans circled the region like vultures. It must be stressed that without complicity from the various Sunni Arab Gulf marionette regimes, it would have been very difficult for the Anglo Americans and later, the Israelis, to get away with so much criminality in the region. It can definitively be said that those regimes did not represent the majority of the Arab street, they were instead working towards implementing the Anglo Zionist agenda, all due to corruption and massive American bribes that came with foreign aid. Osama bin Ladin’s Fatwa in 1996 alluded to these points. He made references to the Saudi regime’s complicity in the schemes of the ‘Zionist-Crusader’ alliance and correctly pointed to the ‘divide-and-conquer’ tactics employed against the Ummah by the Zionist-Crusader alliance. Osama bin Ladin grasped all the problems facing the Islamic world and he took aim at the source of all the trouble by galvanizing Muslim outrage towards the US, Israel and their marionette regimes in the region. Egypt for example, was the third largest recipient of US foreign aid after Israel and South Vietnam. The annual military aid package it received from the US was basically a giant bribe intended on keeping Egypt’s junta quiet about Palestinian plight and keep up the appearance of ‘getting along’ with Israel. The Egyptian junta also crushed the populist ‘Arab Spring’ revolt in Tahrir Square, with Israeli and American support, going against the ‘democratic’ will of the Muslim Brotherhood – a group which Egypt banned and persecuted despite the Muslim Brotherhood’s participation in elections.
From the angle of a true Islamic or Palestinian warrior fighting for justice and dignity, it would amount to nothing other than treason and cowardice. The very same can be said for most Arab regimes in the region, with the exception of Syria, Hizb’allah and Ansar’allah who remained steadfastly opposed to Anglo Zionist imperialism, oppression and humiliation. They did not care about Western bribe money. They stood for ideals much more elevated than money and this was unacceptable to the West, who were seeking subjugation. This is why these forces were always cast in negative light by Western propagandists. The Middle East was thus subjugated by Anglo Zionist crusaders using treacherous Arab henchmen, with pockets of resistance becoming targets of Western propaganda in an attempt to keep the status quo of running a profitable weapons-for-oil trafficking blackmail racket for as long as possible. What went behind the scenes of most Arab capitals was pure and simple extortion. Israeli, American and British governments threatened anyone who dared to step out of line, with death and war. They wanted their henchmen in Amman, Cairo, Riyadh, Dubai, Manama and Kuwait City to continue buying over-priced American weapons, hosting American imperial troops and ignoring the plight of Palestinians – while they were arm twisted into investing their oil wealth back into the American economy and keeping the Arab street ‘pacified’ with authoritarian diktats and Israeli surveillance tools.
If we now go back earlier to the Saud-Wahhab alliance which was cemented and elevated by the British hand, we can refer to an interesting leaked dossier allegedly written by the Iraqi mukhabarat. I originally got my hands on the leaked paper in the mid 2000s as the American occupation forces and sectarian insurgents were looting Saddam’s palaces, seizing gold, artwork and diving into a trove of Iraqi state documents. Some Iraqi mukhabarat dossiers were translated from Arabic into English, this one managed to get out thanks to a source affiliated with the translator. The paper was commissioned in 2002, one year after the September 11 attacks and one year before the American invasion of Iraq. The year 2002 was the last year Saddam’s ministers were banded together as a group. It must be noted that the Iraqis themselves were taken aback by the September 11 false flag attacks and found it necessary to conduct their own investigation into the origins of their Saudi neighbor, since the Saudis determinedly played the patsies in the attack, with most of the hijackers being Saudi nationals. The authors of the paper were able to trace the origins of the Sauds and Wahhabs as being crypto-Jews originating from Jewish lineage in southern Iraq. ‘Crypto-Jews’ often publically took up another faith, such as Islam, yet remained secretly Jewish. The Turkish Dönmeh were another example of ‘crypto-Jews’, some of which managed to ensconce themselves in the upper echelons of Ottoman power.
The authors further alleged that significant correspondence took place between a British agent by the name of ‘Mr Hempher’, who was an Islamophobe, and the burgeoning Saud-Wahhab partnership. Whether or not the details of these exchanges were accurate, is up to question. The motives however, were not surprising nor shocking. It is well understood that the British were behind the Saud-Wahhab partnership. The degenerated, revisionist form of ‘Takfiri’ Islam calling itself ‘Wahhabism’ also raises serious questions about the ideology. Who did this ideology really serve? It did not serve the Ummah. In essence, the Saudi state was co-opted by Anglo Zionists and used to cement an impostor regime misrepresenting Islam – Wahhabism – effectively undermining the Ummah with a subversive ploy to discredit its adherents as violent and intolerant. Being the guardian of Islam’s holiest sites, Saudi Arabia commands guardianship of Mecca, Medina and oversees the Islamic practice of the Hajj. Ensuring the Saudis promoted a degenerated form of Islam while attempting to pass it off as legitimate, while being bolstered with Anglo Zionist money and weapons meant that the Islamic world remained oppressed and subjugated to the whims of outside powers. As the world witnessed on September 11 and its aftermath, the Wahhabis became a very useful tool to Anglo Zionists in a whole host of wicked ploys. The Wahhabis formed the ideologically motivated front-line foot soldiers for the US and Israel’s diabolical regime change plots in the Middle East, giving groups such as ISIS and Jabhat al Nusra recruitment potential. They would eventually be defeated by Iranian proxies.
A highly suspect Casus Belli
A string of strange and curiously timed events coincided with the September 11 attacks, which had all the hallmarks of a classic ‘false flag’ attack:
- Saudi Binladin Group website was taken down on September 11. The Saudi Binladin Group was a Saudi multinational construction company founded by Muhammad bin Ladin, father of Osama bin Ladin. I recall checking the website on the day and it’s hyperlinks were dead, rendering the webpage empty, as seen in the image below. The webpage was dead until 2009 when it became live again.
- In the aftemath of September 11, many Saudi nationals were quietly whisked out of the US by the Bush administration. This was picked up on in a Vanity Fair article on October 2001. The 911 Commission report also acknowledges the following: “After the airspace reopened, nine chartered flights with 160 people, mostly Saudi nationals, departed from the United States between September 14 and 24″.
- One of the strongest pieces of circumstantial evidence for the September 11 attacks being an ‘inside job’ was the curious timing of NORAD drills on the day itself. On September 11, NORAD was running military training exercises simulating an aerial terrorist attack against a civilian target and testing their coordinated responses. The plotters of the attack themselves must have had inside information on the timing of the NORAD drills and timed the actual false flag attack on the exact same day, as to confuse first responders in the military. Various tapes have revealed confused American first responders asking whether the attacks were a drill or a live event.
- The curious case of the 5 ‘dancing Israelis’ or ‘high-fivers’. On September 11, witnesses saw 5 men dancing and celebrating in Manhattan while watching the attacks unfold. They were reported and later the FBI apprehended the men for questioning. The men worked for a Mossad front called ‘Urban Moving Systems’, drove a white van and had camera equipment setup pointing towards the twin towers. They were quietly released back to Israel a few months later and appeared on an Israeli talkshow. FOI requests provided an FBI report. An article also picked up the story on ABC News.
- Exactly one month later on 11 October 2001, Mossad agents posing as Pakistani Muslims were caught in the Mexican legislative assembly with explosives and weapons. The story was covered up and the Internet has largely been scrubbed of the story ever since by Israeli and Western intelligence agencies. It was a provocative planned terrorist attack, a classic false flag Zionist operation intended on pushing Mexico towards an anti-Islamic tilt. Thankfully the attack was thwarted but did raise suspicions on the subversive, insidious and barbaric nature of the Israeli regime. The agents were released back to Israel. The story was picked up by Mexican and Russian media.
- The official narrative on the September 11 attacks was distilled in the ‘911 Commission Report’. It should be noted that many sponsors behind the report were Zionists, Israel-firsters and American foreign policy hawks and the report should not be taken as complete. The authors have an interest in promoting one version of events and omitting, denigrating or covering up any inconvenient facts that run counter to their narrative. There has been mounting opposition to the 911 Commission Report particularly from ‘911 truther’ movements such as ‘AE911Truth’, headed by a group of engineers and architects with the necessary civil engineering expertise to refute the official narrative that fires brought down the twin towers. Furthermore, one more building, WTC Building 7, collapsed on its own despite not being directly struck. There was evidence which suggested the buildings were additionally lined with internal controlled explosives to aid in their demolition, for fire alone could not have felled the towers, given that they were structurally built to withstand terrorist attacks and explosions. One simply cannot discount the opinion of engineers and architects who refuted the official narrative, as unhinged ‘conspiracy theorists’ despite the duplicitous Western media being full swing behind all ‘official’ explanations and maligning any alternatives to the narrative.
An Anglo Zionist crusade to subjugate the peoples of the Middle East
Later, former NATO Supreme Allied Commander and 4 star General, Wesley Clark, revealed publically of a source who told him on November 2001 that the US was going to “take down 7 Muslim countries in 5 years” in the aftermath of 911 – Iraq, Somalia, Syria, Libya, Lebanon, Sudan and Iran. As is often the case in the military, once officers ‘retire’ from service, they can choose to go off script and start making personal commentaries. Wesley Clark has since denied that he had ever said those words and refuses to discuss the idea, despite being documented on video. He was likely tapped on the shoulder by certain people in the intelligence agencies. The attacks were immediately used to justify the overthrow of the Taliban in Afghanistan and Saddam Hussein’s regime, which had no connection to WMDs whatsoever, as purported by Colin Powell, George Tenet, Tony Blair and the rest of the Anglo Zionist ‘Neocon’ apparatus of the Bush administration. It needs to be pointed out that the Bush administration was almost exclusively full of fundamentalist Jewish and Christian Zionists plus Rhodes Scholars:
Richard Perle (Assistant Secretary of Defense for Global Strategic Affairs), Elliot Abrams (Director of the National Security Council’s Office for Democracy, Human Rights and International Operations), Michael Chertoff (Head of the Justice Department’s criminal division), Douglas Feith (Under Secretary of Defense for Policy), Ari Fleischer (White House Press Secretary), David Frum (Bush’s speechwriter), Blake Gottesman (President’s personal aide), Jay Lefkowitz (Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of the Domestic Policy Council), Lewis ‘Scooter’ Libby (Chief of Staff to the Vice President), Ken Mehlman (White House Political Director), Michael Mukasey (Attorney General), Paul Wolfowitz (Deputy Secretary of Defense), Donald Rumsfeld (Secretary of Defense), John Bolton (Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Affairs), Dov Zakheim (Undersecretary of Defense), Dick Cheney (Vice President).
John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt argued in their book ‘The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy’ that AIPAC had an undue influence on American foreign policy. The facts speak for themselves. Jewish Zionists have been infiltrating America with the complicity of a 5th column of evangelical Christian Zionists and British agents, hijacking American foreign policy and commandeering American military might as a battering ram to be used in the Middle East to wage a crusade against Muslims. This was the essence of why September 11 was staged as a false flag attack in the first place. The interests of the Anglo-Americans, Zionists and Wahhabis were all in alignment.
The energy connection
If we fast forward to 2024, the region has witnessed multiple further attempts by the Anglo-Zionist-Wahhabi axis to shape the region in their favor, ever since 911. Notable failures include the ascendancy of Iran, Russia and China in the region. ‘Successes’ include installing imperial trip-wire forces illegally in Syria and Iraq and the steadfast march towards eliminating Palestinians and their statehood claims. Despite all the cruelty and bloodletting levied by the Anglo-Zionist-Wahhabis against the people of the region, they are still no closer to monopolizing full geopolitical control over the region. Social subjugation efforts however, have been successful at browbeating the Arab world and this effort ties in with what NATO has been doing in Europe. Europe has also similarly been browbeaten with both European and Arab peoples sharing a common fate – enslavement to the Anglo Zionist machine. As NATO smashed relations between Russia and Europe to lessen energy dependence on Russia for its European vassals, instead shifting to dependence on American energy supply chains, one such idea has been promoted – an energy corridor dubbed the ‘India-Middle-East-Corridor’ (IMEC). The project will compete with China’s BRI, Egypt’s Suez canal, Turkish-Azeri-Turkmen Caspian sea pipelines and Russia’s ‘North-South Transport Corridor’ (NSTC) in linking Europe with energy and goods supplies. The ultimate aim for all parties and projects is the European ‘cash cow’ market. Pipelines are envisaged to run from Gulf Arab gas and oil deposits, through Saudi Arabia, Israel and into Europe. The project ties in with Chabad Lubovitch devotee, Jared Kushner’s ‘Abraham Accords’ plan to ‘normalize’ relations between Saudi Arabia and Israel as a precursor to these lucrative energy deals. Resolving the Palestinian issue thus becomes central to IMEC, and this is where things become far less certain and more akin to a wild gamble, in a similar vein to the once proposed but now defunct Iran-Iraq-Syria ‘Friendship Pipeline’ into Europe, which quite possibly was the true underpinning for the attempted regime change in Syria in 2011.
But then Hamas launched the surprise attack on October 7 in 2023, putting rapprochement efforts on hold and bringing the Palestinian issue back to the foreground, something many Arabs felt was forgotten. Yahya Sinwar was a cunning man, he spoke Arabic and Hebrew fluently, having spent many years in Israeli detention. For some time, he was very useful to Israel, in particular, to Haredi Jews on the Right who supported Likud and Religious Zionism. He gave them an excuse to continue waging war against Palestinians and played into their game of splitting the Palestinians into Fatah and Hamas. It is well known that Benjamin Netanyahu and his Likud party supported Hamas, especially in the year 2007. However, the Israeli ploy boomeranged back. Sinwar understood the racist and vindictive Israeli settler mentality well and what was needed to trigger it into a bloodthirsty rampage that would further entrench Israel as a global pariah and stymie rapprochement efforts with Sunni Arab regimes.
Questions remained as to how Aman, Shin Bet and Mossad were all caught unaware by the October 7 raid, timed with Yom Kippur, as in 1973. There was some speculation, inside Israel and beyond, that the raid was enabled from within. Sinwar understood Israel’s predictably barbaric response, with a war in Gaza throwing a wrench into the ‘Abrahamic Accords’. Suspicions were confirmed, with Saudi Arabia pouring cold water on the idea of rapprochement with Israel until a Palestinian state was created and the Arab-Israeli conflict resolved. In light of Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Gaza, Saudi efforts to ‘normalize’ with Israel, despite all the backroom arm twisting, were no longer timely or appropriate without risking a backlash among the Saudi population. Behind the scenes, the Gulf Arab marionette regimes did not care for Palestinian plight, they were corrupted by money and American degenerate culture, preferring to host glamorous MMA fights and Taylor Swift concerts instead of rallying in support of oppressed Palestinians. Saudi mosques, according to my sources, have been conveying a consistent messaging of late. They have been imploring worshippers to ‘trust the authorities’ and obey what they are doing without question. The need to do this arises out of insecurity. The Saudi regime rests on a shaky foundation. It has no ability to defend itself, relying solely on military assistance and spyware from Britain, Israel and America to suppress dissent and keep the Shia threat at bay. The specter of Iran is always dangled by the Anglo Zionists to frighten the Saudi regime into compliance. The promise of endless American weapons and support provide the regime a reason to sleep soundly at night.
But a growing rift with the Arab street who demand more be done for Palestinians and refuse to be humiliated by foreign powers, forces the regime to publically throw support towards a ‘2 State Solution’ despite their abject lack of concern for Palestinians. Thus, Saudi Arabia and other Sunni vassals in the region find themselves in a tight spot in their dealings with the Israeli Apartheid state in light of Likud’s psychotic war crimes and moral gaslighting against the peope of Gaza. The intended forced displacement of Gaza’s civilians constitutes a war crime in itself, and the problem is being doggedly thrown onto Egypt, putting its 1979 ‘Peace Treaty’ with Israel at stake – along with Egyptian regime credibility in the process. Arab regime cowardice and vassalage to the Anglo Zionists is the reason why the Arab world remains oppressed and subjugated. This will become ultimately the downfall of Arab marionette regimes, making revolutions all but inevitable. Wahhabism as a school of thought and as an interpretation of Islam will be dismantled and discredited once the Saud-Wahhab regime falls. The Saudi state’s great wealth will make it more difficult to remove the regime, as it attempts to purchase its way into legitimacy by quelling dissent with cash injections, subsidies, and a bold ‘Saudi Vision 2030’ plan.
We finally note Benjamin Netanyahu’s address at the UN, shortly before the October 7, 2023 attacks. In his typical fashion of using props to aid his speeches, a placard of the ‘New Middle East’ was flaunted, notably with Palestine erased from the map. He proceeded to draw a pipeline from the Persian Gulf gas and oil deposits running through Saudi Arabia, Israel and on towards Europe, demonstrating the energy plays at stake. What remains a persistent motif with the mentality of the Anglo Zionists is how entire nations and peoples who stand in the way of their stubborn ‘projects’ are being wiped out and destroyed with little concern, instead of being consulted. The West’s morally bankrupt position in the world will be looked back on by future historians as nothing short of unenlighthened barbarism no different from Roman times, cloaking itself as something more.
Chutzpah as far as the eye can see
A tragicomic House Resolution 57 of the 118 Congress was passed in July 2023 by 412-9-1, submitted by August Pfluger. It highlighted the gross lack of self-awareness and psychological projection by Zionist agents within the American political system. Take note that the resolution was passed months before Apartheid Israel’s anti-Semitic bout of bloodletting and war crimes in Gaza:
The fact that the US House, nearly 100% full of Zionists and Israel-firsters, felt the need to pass such an absurd resolution only reinforces everything I have been writing about. An unhealthy, parasitic master-slave dynamic between Israel and America, sophistry-laden claims of ‘anti-Semitism’ coming from the Jewish side while Israel conducts anti-Semitic attacks against Palestinians and the reinforcement of the notion that Israel is indeed, a racist Apartheid state. The resolution all but confirms it. This stunning level of fundamentalism is what the world is up against.